Vote · Roll call

Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120)

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote: Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120)
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result: 502 for · 128 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 28 April 2026, 13:56

More facts (6)

Position: vote 13 of 35 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – Article 19, after § 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) – Am 120CP3
Text: Report A-9-2022-0147
Dossier: 2021/0297(COD)
Vote id: 191138

Position: vote 13 of 35 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – Article 19, after § 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) – Am 120CP3
Text: Report A-9-2022-0147
Dossier: 2021/0297(COD)
Vote id: 191138

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 43	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 1	Against 45	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
S&D	For 121	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 14 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 68	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 162	Against 1	Abst. 0	No vote 22 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
ECR	For 66	Against 1	Abst. 6	No vote 8 of 81	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.86
Patriots	For 72	Against 5	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.90
ESN	For 0	Against 24	Abst. 3	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.83
No group	For 12	Against 9	Abst. 7	No vote 2 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–3	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	1–0–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–0–3	7–0–0	0–0–1	0–2–1
Germany	0–3–0	0–14–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	27–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	3–0–5
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–2–0	17–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	0–3–0	0–2–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–8–0	0–3–0	13–0–0	13–0–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	0–0–1	0–1–0
Greece	0–4–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–3–1
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–10–0	0–4–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	8–0–0	19–0–0	6–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	21–0–0	18–0–0	3–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	8–0–0	2–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	10–0–0	3–0–0	8–0–0	5–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–2–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Austria	6	0
Belgium	3	0
Czechia	7	0
Denmark	1	0
Spain	0	5
France	28	0
Greece	1	0
Hungary	8	0
Italy	6	0
Latvia	1	0
Netherlands	6	0
Poland	3	0
Portugal	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Abir AL-SAHLANI group that day: Renew · Sweden
Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Antonella SBERNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Benoit CASSART group that day: Renew · Belgium
Biljana BORZAN group that day: S&D · Croatia
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Costas MAVRIDES group that day: S&D · Cyprus
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
David MCALLISTER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Estelle CEULEMANS group that day: S&D · Belgium
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Javi LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR group that day: S&D · Spain
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Loucas FOURLAS group that day: EPP · Cyprus
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Marko VEŠLIGAJ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Olivier CHASTEL group that day: Renew · Belgium
Pascal ARIMONT group that day: EPP · Belgium
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Patryk JAKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Peter LIESE group that day: EPP · Germany
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN group that day: ECR · Finland
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Wouter BEKE group that day: EPP · Belgium
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 53 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	480 for, 111 against, 24 abstained Adopted	For 78 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.88 565 voters
9 Sept 2025	Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Amendment	530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted	For 82 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.87 580 voters
21 Jan 2025	Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia	Final	505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted	For 79 %		r · shared0.86 570 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
9 Sept 2025	Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement	Final	473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted	For 73 %		r · shared0.85 579 voters
9 Sept 2025	Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Amendment	512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 79 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.85 579 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 48 — part 8 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	475 for, 134 against, 17 abstained Adopted	For 76 %	Requested by EPP	r · shared0.85 574 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 16 — part 7 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	486 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted	For 78 %	Requested by EPP	r · shared0.84 574 voters
10 Sept 2025	Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Vanuatu	Final	528 for, 89 against, 48 abstained Adopted	For 79 %		r · shared0.83 597 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 48 — part 5 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	469 for, 129 against, 13 abstained Adopted	For 77 %	Requested by EPP	r · shared0.83 562 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 22 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	489 for, 122 against, 11 abstained Adopted	For 79 %		r · shared0.83 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Generalised scheme of tariff preferences New EU law · report by Bernd Lange 28 Apr 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Proposal to reject the text Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Proposal to vote on amendments Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Amendment 130, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Amendment 127, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Amendment 139, adding text after Recital 27 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Final vote Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026 Passed
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Final vote on the provisional agreement Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences — Separate vote on recital 28 (corresponds to recital 39 in am 120) Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191138, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191138,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191138, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}