Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120)

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote
Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120)
Result
502 for · 128 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 35 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – Article 19, after § 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) – Am 120CP3
Vote id
191138
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 502 for, 128 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 45Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 162Against 1Abst. 0No vote 22 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 66Against 1Abst. 6No vote 8 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 72Against 5Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 3No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 12Against 9Abst. 7No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia021
Germany305
France010
Greece031
Luxembourg100
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 53 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote480 for, 111 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 565 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 580 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.86 570 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.85 579 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 579 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 8 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote475 for, 134 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 574 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 16 — part 7 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote486 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 574 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of VanuatuFinal528 for, 89 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 597 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 5 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote469 for, 129 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 562 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 22 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote489 for, 122 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191138, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191138,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 120 — part 3 to article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191138},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191138, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}