Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after Recital AL

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Amendment 4, after Recital AL
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
316 for · 298 against · 33 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 28 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – After Recital AL – Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190330
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 316 for, 298 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 15Against 147Abst. 3No vote 20 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 3Against 59Abst. 10No vote 9 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 13No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden200
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital O — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 528 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 636 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.91 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 584 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 595 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 543 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 532 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 42 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment283 for, 298 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by EPP, Renew, S&Dr · shared0.90 528 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 626 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 22 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment293 for, 352 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190330
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after Recital AL — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190330, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190330 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190330,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after Recital AL — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190330}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190330},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190330, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}