Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital AJ — part 2

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Recital AJ — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
394 for · 217 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AJ/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190326
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 394 for, 217 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 62 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 126Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 2Abst. 2No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 67Against 74Abst. 15No vote 29 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ECRFor 2Against 68Abst. 3No vote 8 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 35Against 41Abst. 1No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 8No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia111
Germany215
France100
Greece310
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia212

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsFinal390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.88 568 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on citation 14 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote310 for, 183 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.83 487 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote414 for, 193 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.82 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 481 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.82 576 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.82 612 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.82 582 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 579 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote319 for, 183 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.81 489 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 578 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190326
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AJ — part 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190326, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190326 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190326,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AJ — part 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190326}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190326},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190326, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}