Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital AC — part 1

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Recital AC — part 1
Result
475 for · 109 against · 68 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:11
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AC/1
Vote id
190322
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 475 for, 109 against, 68 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas widespread impunity for rape contributes to the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 150Against 1Abst. 15No vote 19 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 7Against 51Abst. 15No vote 8 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 12Against 27Abst. 35No vote 11 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 1Against 25Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany900
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland600
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden200
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital BB — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote439 for, 168 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 601 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 71 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 581 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.86 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 557 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeFinal481 for, 157 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.86 594 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 555 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 524 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote429 for, 120 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 546 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.85 606 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 4 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote538 for, 123 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.85 607 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AC — part 1 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190322, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190322 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190322,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AC — part 1 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190322}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190322},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190322, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}