Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: citation 16

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Separate vote: citation 16
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
347 for · 257 against · 43 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:11
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Visa 16
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190320
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 347 for, 257 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 126Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 46Against 89Abst. 24No vote 26 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ECRFor 4Against 68Abst. 2No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 5Against 65Abst. 6No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 7Against 11Abst. 9No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria005
Belgium300
Bulgaria120
Cyprus020
Czechia311
Germany2251
Denmark002
Estonia100
Spain0191
Finland300
France040
Greece060
Croatia022
Hungary040
Ireland400
Italy422
Lithuania020
Luxembourg200
Latvia110
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland1056
Portugal070
Romania213
Sweden401
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 581 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 580 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 576 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 102 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSeparate vote291 for, 240 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 582 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.84 583 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote301 for, 298 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 556 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Members (B), Renewr · shared0.84 588 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 28 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote289 for, 309 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ESN, EPPr · shared0.84 611 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 73 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote279 for, 289 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.83 556 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote267 for, 297 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.83 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190320
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: citation 16 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190320, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190320 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190320,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: citation 16 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190320}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190320},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190320, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}