Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 21 — part 2

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Paragraph 21 — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
359 for · 218 against · 62 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 21/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190313
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 68Against 76Abst. 16No vote 25 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ECRFor 1Against 66Abst. 3No vote 11 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 0Against 40Abst. 35No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 9Against 10Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium003
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0170
Lithuania010
Latvia020
Netherlands030
Poland0190
Romania140
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 639 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 574 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsFinal390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.87 567 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 568 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025Final310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.86 539 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 578 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 578 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 582 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Members (B), Renewr · shared0.85 579 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 573 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190313
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 21 — part 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190313, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190313 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190313,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 21 — part 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190313}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190313},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190313, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}