Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 to paragraph 21

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote: Amendment 6 to paragraph 21
Decision: No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result: 312 for · 321 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 28 April 2026, 14:09

More facts (6)

Position: vote 14 of 31 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D, Renew
Official label: A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 21 – Am 6
Text: Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier: 2025/2040(INI)
Vote id: 190310

Position: vote 14 of 31 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D, Renew
Official label: A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 21 – Am 6
Text: Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier: 2025/2040(INI)
Vote id: 190310

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 42	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 45	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 126	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 65	Against 0	Abst. 5	No vote 7 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.89
EPP	For 23	Against 141	Abst. 2	No vote 19 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.77
ECR	For 2	Against 69	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 81	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Patriots	For 1	Against 76	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
ESN	For 0	Against 25	Abst. 1	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 8	Against 10	Abst. 8	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	2–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	0–2–1
Germany	3–0–0	14–0–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	2–27–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	2–1–5
Denmark	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	2–0–0	19–0–0	1–0–0	0–20–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	1–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	3–0–0	13–0–0	12–0–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	0–0–1	0–0–1
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	3–1–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–2	3–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	0–7–1	0–19–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–1–0	0–3–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	9–12–0	0–16–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Portugal	1–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	0–0–2	3–4–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	10–0–0	2–0–1	0–8–0	2–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–1
Sweden	2–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	2–3–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	Against	Abst.
Bulgaria	3	0
Czechia	1	0
Germany	15	0
France	0	1
Hungary	1	0
Italy	1	0
Lithuania	1	0
Poland	1	0
Slovakia	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Antonella SBERNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Estelle CEULEMANS group that day: S&D · Belgium
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
João OLIVEIRA group that day: The Left · Portugal
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Laurence FARRENG group that day: Renew · France
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Ľuboš BLAHA group that day: No group · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Patryk JAKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA group that day: ECR · Romania
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Taner KABILOV group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Željana ZOVKO group that day: EPP · Croatia
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens, EPP	r · shared0.92 598 voters
9 Jul 2025	Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate Law	Procedural	300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 44 %		r · shared0.91 613 voters
29 Apr 2026	Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 45 %	Requested by EPP	r · shared0.90 594 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Feb 2026	Recital O — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Split vote	269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 47 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.90 532 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council	Amendment	283 for, 358 against, 20 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.90 592 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 46 %	Requested by Greens, EPP	r · shared0.90 618 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 4 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Split vote	274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 47 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.90 537 voters
19 Dec 2024	Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	264 for, 292 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 47 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots, ECR	r · shared0.90 508 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 112 — part 3 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report	Split vote	284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 45 %	Requested by EPP, S&D	r · shared0.90 602 voters
8 Oct 2025	Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain	Amendment	282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.90 586 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Resolution · report by Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus 28 Apr 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 4 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 4 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 19 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190310
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190310, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190310 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190310,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190310}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190310},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190310, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}