Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 19 — part 1

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Paragraph 19 — part 1
Result
504 for · 116 against · 33 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 19/1
Vote id
190305
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 504 for, 116 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘as well as ending the systemic and structural deficiencies that foster a societal sense of impunity for rape and allow the perpetrators of sexual violence to go unpunished’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 144Against 4Abst. 18No vote 19 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 15Against 52Abst. 7No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 41Against 28Abst. 7No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 21Against 6Abst. 1No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1700
Finland200
France1300
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1800
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta100
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 517 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 506 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote474 for, 136 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.83 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote515 for, 112 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.82 599 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote381 for, 118 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 498 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 4 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote538 for, 123 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.82 608 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote417 for, 138 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 522 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 45 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote495 for, 129 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.82 581 voters
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 3 — part 2 Severe political, humanitarian and human rights crisis in Sudan, in particular the sexual violence and child rapeSplit vote499 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 556 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 546 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 19 — part 1 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190305, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190305 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190305,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 19 — part 1 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190305}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190305},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190305, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}