Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to paragraph 16

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Amendment 5 to paragraph 16
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
378 for · 213 against · 59 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 16 – Am 5
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190303
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 378 for, 213 against, 59 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 22Against 117Abst. 28No vote 18 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
ECRFor 7Against 48Abst. 16No vote 10 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
PatriotsFor 51Against 20Abst. 6No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 6No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany900
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland600
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden200
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote339 for, 302 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.82 591 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote337 for, 303 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.82 595 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote340 for, 285 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.79 587 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 549 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesAmendment337 for, 246 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 559 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment308 for, 309 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.79 600 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AC Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote238 for, 217 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 46 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 476 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.78 401 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment312 for, 248 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 537 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190303
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190303, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190303 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190303,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190303}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190303},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190303, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}