Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 7

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
223 for · 343 against · 86 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – After § 7 – Am 3
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190298
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 223 for, 343 against, 86 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 32Abst. 1No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 24Against 100Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
RenewFor 11Against 56Abst. 2No vote 8 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
EPPFor 150Against 2Abst. 15No vote 18 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 13Against 55Abst. 7No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
PatriotsFor 7Against 21Abst. 49No vote 8 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 9Against 9Abst. 9No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria311
Cyprus002
Czechia500
Germany2900
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland300
France212
Greece006
Croatia400
Hungary400
Ireland400
Italy701
Lithuania201
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland2100
Portugal700
Romania800
Sweden401
Slovenia500
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote182 for, 369 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.63 521 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 6 — part 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment282 for, 309 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.56 551 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.56 645 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point k — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote240 for, 316 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.55 524 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.54 595 voters
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalitySeparate vote337 for, 273 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.54 601 voters
22 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Final260 for, 194 against, 110 abstained Adopted For 46 %r · shared0.53 511 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.53 595 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2 Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedyAmendment312 for, 281 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.53 582 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 86 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment271 for, 264 against, 106 abstained Adopted For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.52 586 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190298
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 7 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190298, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190298 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190298,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 7 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190298}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190298},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190298, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}