Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 2

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
394 for · 227 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 31 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 4/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
190297
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 394 for, 227 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 61 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 2Abst. 3No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 65Against 83Abst. 13No vote 24 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ECRFor 3Against 65Abst. 5No vote 8 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 32Against 40Abst. 4No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 10Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsFinal390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.88 575 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 488 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.84 618 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.84 588 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote319 for, 183 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.83 496 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 585 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 584 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on citation 14 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote310 for, 183 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.83 493 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 573 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote414 for, 193 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 593 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190297
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190297, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190297 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190297,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190297}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190297},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190297, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}