Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 1

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote: Paragraph 4 — part 1
Decision: No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result: 492 for · 126 against · 34 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 28 April 2026, 14:07

More facts (6)

Position: vote 3 of 31 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label: A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 4/1
Text: Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier: 2025/2040(INI)
Vote id: 190296

Position: vote 3 of 31 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label: A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 4/1
Text: Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier: 2025/2040(INI)
Vote id: 190296

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 75 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to eradicate all the manifestations of the prevalent complex set of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 43	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 46	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 124	Against 1	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 70	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 159	Against 4	Abst. 2	No vote 20 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.95
ECR	For 20	Against 46	Abst. 6	No vote 9 of 81	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.46
Patriots	For 12	Against 42	Abst. 22	No vote 9 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.33
ESN	For 1	Against 25	Abst. 1	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.89
No group	For 17	Against 8	Abst. 3	No vote 2 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–0–6	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–3	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	1–0–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	3–0–0	5–1–0	0–1–0	1–0–2
Germany	3–0–0	14–0–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	28–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	7–1–0
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	2–0–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	1–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	3–0–0	13–0–0	13–0–0	4–1–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	1–0–0	1–0–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	3–0–1
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	0–0–8	0–0–1	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	7–1–0	2–17–0	0–0–6	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	1–0–2	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–1	0–18–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	2–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	0–1–1	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	10–0–0	3–0–0	8–0–0	4–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0
Sweden	2–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–1	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	4–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	3–3–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Bulgaria	1	0	0
Cyprus	1	0	0
Czechia	1	0	2
Germany	7	1	0
France	1	0	0
Greece	3	0	1
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Poland	0	1	0
Romania	0	2	0
Slovakia	3	3	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Antonella SBERNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Estelle CEULEMANS group that day: S&D · Belgium
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Javi LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Paulius SAUDARGAS group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA group that day: ECR · Romania
Sven SIMON group that day: EPP · Germany
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Tomáš KUBÍN group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI group that day: ECR · Lithuania
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
9 Jul 2025	Paragraph 42 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum	Split vote	468 for, 180 against, 21 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.85 603 voters
9 Jul 2025	Paragraph 42 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum	Split vote	452 for, 172 against, 42 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.84 602 voters
9 Sept 2025	Paragraph 71 — part 2 Public procurement	Split vote	457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.84 581 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
9 Jul 2025	Paragraph 42 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum	Split vote	461 for, 186 against, 21 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.84 603 voters
29 Apr 2026	Recital BB — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	439 for, 168 against, 16 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.84 602 voters
22 Jan 2026	Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.84 555 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 56 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	419 for, 173 against, 34 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.83 606 voters
22 Jan 2026	Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.83 557 voters
22 Jan 2026	Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	426 for, 151 against, 31 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.83 557 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.83 621 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Resolution · report by Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus 28 Apr 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 4 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 19 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 19 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190296
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190296, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190296 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190296,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190296}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190296},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190296, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}