Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote: Amendment 2
Decision: No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result: 179 for · 457 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 28 April 2026, 14:07

More facts (6)

Position: vote 2 of 31 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ESN, S&D, Renew
Official label: A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 2
Text: Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier: 2025/2040(INI)
Vote id: 190294

Position: vote 2 of 31 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ESN, S&D, Renew
Official label: A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 2
Text: Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier: 2025/2040(INI)
Vote id: 190294

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 41	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Greens	For 0	Against 45	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 0	Against 124	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 0	Against 70	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 77	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 3	Against 160	Abst. 3	No vote 19 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.95
ECR	For 67	Against 2	Abst. 5	No vote 7 of 81	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.86
Patriots	For 71	Against 0	Abst. 6	No vote 8 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.88
ESN	For 27	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 10	Against 15	Abst. 3	No vote 2 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–2–1	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	0–1–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	3–0–0	1–0–6	1–0–0	2–1–0
Germany	0–3–0	0–14–0	0–14–0	0–9–0	0–29–0	no member voted	no member voted	15–0–0	0–7–1
Denmark	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–1–1	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–19–0	0–1–0	0–20–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–8–0	0–3–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	1–4–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	0–4–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–6–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	8–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	1–8–0	0–3–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–8–0	19–0–0	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–2	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	1–0–2	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	19–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	0–10–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	2–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–1–2

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Austria	0	5	0
Belgium	0	3	0
Bulgaria	0	5	0
Cyprus	0	2	0
Czechia	0	5	0
Germany	0	29	0
Denmark	0	1	1
Estonia	0	1	1
Spain	0	20	0
Finland	0	3	0
France	1	4	0
Greece	0	6	0
Croatia	0	3	0
Hungary	0	4	0
Ireland	0	4	0
Italy	0	8	0
Lithuania	0	3	0
Luxembourg	0	2	0
Latvia	0	2	0
Malta	0	2	0
Netherlands	0	4	0
Poland	0	21	0
Portugal	0	7	0
Romania	0	8	0
Sweden	0	5	0
Slovenia	2	3	0
Slovakia	0	0	1

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Antonella SBERNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Dario TAMBURRANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Estelle CEULEMANS group that day: S&D · Belgium
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Grégory ALLIONE group that day: Renew · France
Hannes HEIDE group that day: S&D · Austria
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Ignazio Roberto MARINO group that day: Greens · Italy
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA group that day: ECR · Romania
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Tomislav SOKOL group that day: EPP · Croatia
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	Amendment	188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 648 voters
20 May 2026	Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins	Amendment	188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.96 599 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Amendment	199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.96 582 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
21 May 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Amendment	146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.96 439 voters
20 May 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins	Amendment	198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 602 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Amendment	189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 578 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds	Amendment	192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 592 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 88 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Amendment	195 for, 443 against, 0 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 583 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Amendment	186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.96 641 voters
18 May 2026	Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena	Other	134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 30 %		r · shared0.96 410 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Resolution · report by Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus 28 Apr 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 4 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 4 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 12 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 19 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU — Paragraph 19 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190294
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190294, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190294 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190294,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190294}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190294},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190294, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}