Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 9

The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 9
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
481 for · 151 against · 17 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 7 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0043/2026 – Željana Zovko – § 9
Text
Report A-10-2026-0043
Dossier
2025/2054(INI)
Vote id
190205
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 481 for, 151 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 10Against 33Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 166Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 70Against 3Abst. 0No vote 8 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 9Against 61Abst. 7No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 22Against 1Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 12Against 6Abst. 8No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Poland010
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sectorFinal426 for, 182 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.82 589 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 37 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardSeparate vote391 for, 90 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 522 voters
17 Dec 2024Final vote Forest reproductive material of the ‘tested’ categoryFinal499 for, 131 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.76 594 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 583 voters
11 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024Final378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.75 574 voters
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Cook Islands Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (2025-2032): Implementing ProtocolFinal476 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.75 599 voters
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesSeparate vote419 for, 226 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Members (a)r · shared0.73 608 voters
9 Oct 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 11 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationAmendment467 for, 95 against, 90 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.73 576 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.72 588 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorsFinal467 for, 158 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.69 604 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190205
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 9 — The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190205, reference 2025/2054(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190205 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190205,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 9 — The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190205}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190205},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190205, reference 2025/2054(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}