Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
527 for · 85 against · 33 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:29
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0022/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – Motion for a resolution
Text
Report A-10-2026-0022
Dossier
2025/2032(INI)
Vote id
190186
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 527 for, 85 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 82 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 164Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 54Against 0Abst. 20No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
PatriotsFor 16Against 54Abst. 7No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 15Against 8Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland500
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden200
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 5 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote447 for, 74 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 530 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: AgenciesFinal475 for, 107 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.84 623 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital A The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSeparate vote459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 530 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal485 for, 113 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.83 587 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorFinal548 for, 74 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.82 591 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 537 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: Joint UndertakingsFinal513 for, 101 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.80 580 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote497 for, 138 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.80 590 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.79 592 voters
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 108 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSeparate vote503 for, 108 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 602 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190186
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190186, reference 2025/2032(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190186 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190186,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190186}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190186},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190186, reference 2025/2032(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}