Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture

Vote: Final vote on the whole text
Decision: No. 13 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result: 430 for · 107 against · 115 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 28 April 2026, 14:27

More facts (6)

Effect: Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position: vote 7 of 7 on the decision
Official label: A10-0043/2026 – Željana Zovko – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text: Report A-10-2026-0043
Dossier: 2025/2054(INI)
Vote id: 189928

Effect: Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position: vote 7 of 7 on the decision
Official label: A10-0043/2026 – Željana Zovko – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text: Report A-10-2026-0043
Dossier: 2025/2054(INI)
Vote id: 189928

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 3	Abst. 39	No vote 3 of 46	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.86
Greens	For 0	Against 0	Abst. 46	No vote 7 of 53	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 121	Against 0	Abst. 3	No vote 11 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.96
Renew	For 62	Against 2	Abst. 6	No vote 7 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.83
EPP	For 165	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 19 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
ECR	For 69	Against 4	Abst. 3	No vote 5 of 81	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.86
Patriots	For 0	Against 69	Abst. 8	No vote 8 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.84
ESN	For 0	Against 23	Abst. 2	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.88
No group	For 12	Against 6	Abst. 7	No vote 5 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–0–2	5–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–0–1	0–0–2	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	1–0–0
Cyprus	0–0–1	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–7	0–1–0	1–0–2
Germany	0–1–2	0–0–14	13–0–0	4–0–4	27–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–14–1	1–0–4
Denmark	0–1–0	0–0–3	3–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–0–4	0–0–2	19–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	0–0–3	0–0–2	2–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–0–8	0–0–3	13–0–0	13–0–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	0–28–0	0–1–0	1–0–0
Greece	1–0–3	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	0–0–2	0–0–1	no member voted	0–4–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–0–1	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–0–1	no member voted
Ireland	0–0–3	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–0–10	0–0–4	18–0–0	1–0–0	8–0–0	20–0–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–0–1	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–0–1	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–0–1	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–0–6	0–0–3	3–2–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	21–0–0	19–0–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Portugal	0–0–2	no member voted	7–0–0	0–0–2	7–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	10–0–0	3–0–0	8–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–0
Sweden	0–0–2	0–0–2	5–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–0–1	1–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	5–0–1

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Belgium	3	0	0
Bulgaria	1	0	0
Cyprus	1	0	0
Czechia	3	0	0
Denmark	1	0	0
Estonia	0	0	1
Spain	2	0	0
Finland	0	1	0
France	4	0	0
Greece	0	0	2
Croatia	1	0	0
Italy	20	0	0
Lithuania	2	0	0
Latvia	3	0	0
Netherlands	3	0	0
Poland	19	0	0
Romania	6	0	0
Sweden	0	3	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Estelle CEULEMANS group that day: S&D · Belgium
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Maria NOICHL group that day: S&D · Germany
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Martin SONNEBORN group that day: No group · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG group that day: No group · Germany
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Moritz KÖRNER group that day: Renew · Germany
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Petras GRAŽULIS group that day: ESN · Lithuania
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Sibylle BERG group that day: No group · Germany
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Stefan BERGER group that day: EPP · Germany
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	r · shared
9 Sept 2025	Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Final	431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	r · shared0.91 591 voters
25 Nov 2025	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector	Final	426 for, 182 against, 39 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	r · shared0.85 591 voters
7 May 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service	Final	475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 72 %	r · shared0.83 598 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Jun 2026	Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Bosnia and Herzegovina	Final	478 for, 116 against, 54 abstained Adopted	For 74 %		r · shared0.82 593 voters
10 Mar 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 32 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Separate vote	483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained Adopted	For 78 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.82 577 voters
9 Sept 2025	Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Amendment	444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.82 586 voters
9 Sept 2025	Amendment 134 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles	Amendment	473 for, 154 against, 22 abstained Adopted	For 73 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.82 588 voters
11 Feb 2025	Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024	Final	378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted	For 59 %		r · shared0.81 576 voters
16 Jun 2026	Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries	Separate vote	419 for, 226 against, 20 abstained Adopted	For 63 %	Requested by Members (a)	r · shared0.81 610 voters
27 Nov 2025	Final vote Amending Regulations on the Internal Market Information System (IMI) and on the single digital gateway as regards certain harmonisation requirements on transparency	Final	400 for, 77 against, 132 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.81 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture Resolution · report by Željana Zovko 28 Apr 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture — Separate vote on paragraph 5 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture — Separate vote on paragraph 9 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture — Separate vote on paragraph 17 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture — Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 35 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026
Vote The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture — Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 35 Roll-call vote · 28 Apr 2026 28 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189928
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 189928, reference 2025/2054(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189928 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-189928,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189928}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189928},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189928, reference 2025/2054(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}