Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
447 for · 160 against · 43 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:13
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 31 of 31 on the decision
Official label
A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0047
Dossier
2025/2040(INI)
Vote id
189914
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 447 for, 160 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 146Against 6Abst. 11No vote 22 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 4Against 60Abst. 10No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 13No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 7No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0140
France001
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland010
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 523 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 612 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote421 for, 181 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 601 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote461 for, 186 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.93 602 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote452 for, 172 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.93 600 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 574 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote468 for, 180 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.93 601 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote423 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 603 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 554 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 550 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189914
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 189914, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189914 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-189914,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189914}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/189914},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189914, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}