Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 91 to article 1

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)

Vote
Amendment 91 to article 1
Result
214 for · 408 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – Article 2 – after § 10 – Am 91
Vote id
189623
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 214 for, 408 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 8No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 107Abst. 1No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 20Against 142Abst. 3No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 73Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 83Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 13Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 635 members

No vote recorded, 83

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 83 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment191 for, 371 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 511 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 505 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment187 for, 380 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.94 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 53 to paragraph 173 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment237 for, 405 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 575 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 562 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 525 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment158 for, 374 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.92 509 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment167 for, 363 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 506 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 555 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, Renewr · shared0.92 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 91 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189623, reference 2025/0359(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189623 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189623,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 91 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189623}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189623},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189623, reference 2025/0359(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}