Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Result
208 for · 414 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:07
More facts (7)
Effect
Objection failed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0178/2026 – Motion for a resolution
Vote id
189598
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 208 for, 414 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Objection failed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 106Abst. 1No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 10Against 155Abst. 0No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 2No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 83Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 86

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 86 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.97 404 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 419 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 558 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital 17 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment205 for, 449 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment181 for, 380 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 515 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.96 589 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 578 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51 to paragraph 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 460 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 584 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.96 576 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 135, adding text after paragraph 49 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment209 for, 429 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.96 571 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)Other130 for, 316 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.96 410 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189598, reference 2025/3044(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189598 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189598,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189598}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189598},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189598, reference 2025/3044(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}