Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application

Vote
Final vote
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 26 Mar 2026
Result
228 for · 311 against · 92 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:18
More facts (6)
Effect
Failed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 10 of 10 on the decision
Official label
A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Commission proposal
Text
Report A-10-2026-0040
Dossier
2025/0429(COD)
Vote id
189270
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Failed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 33Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 3Against 33Abst. 11No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
S&DFor 95Against 8Abst. 2No vote 30 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 33Against 29Abst. 6No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
EPPFor 22Against 137Abst. 5No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 27Against 12Abst. 35No vote 7 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
PatriotsFor 40Against 19Abst. 24No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 3No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 4Against 16Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain020
Finland030
France080
Greece300
Ireland100
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 631 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

No similar vote found.

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189270
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189270, reference 2025/0429(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189270 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189270,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189270}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189270},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189270, reference 2025/0429(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}