Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 25 Mar 2026
Result
134 for · 350 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
25 March 2026, 15:17
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia
Vote id
189875
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 9Against 28Abst. 0No vote 16 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
S&DFor 1Against 85Abst. 0No vote 49 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 1Against 50Abst. 0No vote 26 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 1Against 145Abst. 1No vote 37 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 7Against 34Abst. 3No vote 37 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 56Against 3Abst. 8No vote 18 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 15Against 3Abst. 0No vote 9 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 13Against 2Abst. 2No vote 13 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria221
Belgium300
Czechia800
Denmark100
Spain006
France2300
Hungary1000
Italy100
Netherlands510
Poland300
Portugal001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 498 members

No vote recorded, 220

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 220 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 461 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.83 402 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 11 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment168 for, 434 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 460 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.81 390 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment162 for, 407 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 419 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 452 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment143 for, 478 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 472 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment137 for, 478 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 469 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaAmendment142 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 382 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 32 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment168 for, 447 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 465 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-25/189875
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia”. Vote, 25 March 2026. votingId 189875. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-25/189875 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-25-189875,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-25/189875}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-25/189875},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189875. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}