Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 to recital B

Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024

Vote
Amendment 22 to recital B
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2026
Result
168 for · 379 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2026, 12:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 54 of 70 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Recital B – Am 22
Text
Report A-10-2026-0015
Dossier
2025/2138(INI)
Vote id
188927
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 379 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 30Abst. 1No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 1Against 106Abst. 0No vote 28 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 57Abst. 2No vote 17 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 3Against 139Abst. 1No vote 41 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 59Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 2Abst. 3No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany0260
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0140
Finland040
France131
Greece060
Croatia050
Ireland030
Italy050
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0200
Portugal060
Romania080
Sweden030
Slovenia130
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 555 members

No vote recorded, 163

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 163 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 511 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 534 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 179 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment207 for, 443 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2025Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther132 for, 334 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.97 362 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 500 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.97 498 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 498 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 515 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 507 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 Draft amending budget No 1/2026: entering the surplus of the financial year 2025Amendment207 for, 442 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 512 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188927
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 22 to recital B — Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024”. Vote, 12 March 2026. votingId 188927, reference 2025/2138(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188927 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-12-188927,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 to recital B — Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188927}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188927},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188927, reference 2025/2138(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}