Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 40 — part 2 to paragraph 19

Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024

Vote
Amendment 40 — part 2 to paragraph 19
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2026
Result
224 for · 329 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2026, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 47 of 70 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 19 – Am 40/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0015
Dossier
2025/2138(INI)
Vote id
188925
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 224 for, 329 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 40 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 5Against 55Abst. 0No vote 16 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 4Against 136Abst. 1No vote 43 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 7Against 53Abst. 1No vote 20 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 8Against 53Abst. 0No vote 23 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 8Abst. 5No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

No vote recorded, 158

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 158 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 353 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.91 474 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.91 473 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 374 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment167 for, 294 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 384 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment164 for, 288 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 385 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 480 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 520 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 529 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment200 for, 384 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.89 476 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 477 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188925
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 40 — part 2 to paragraph 19 — Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024”. Vote, 12 March 2026. votingId 188925, reference 2025/2138(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188925 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-12-188925,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 40 — part 2 to paragraph 19 — Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188925}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188925},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188925, reference 2025/2138(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}