Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 12 — part 2

Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024

Vote
Paragraph 12 — part 2
Result
172 for · 385 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2026, 12:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 70 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/2
Vote id
188910
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 172 for, 385 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “environmental”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 1No vote 26 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 4Against 57Abst. 0No vote 15 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 11Against 130Abst. 1No vote 42 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 55Against 3Abst. 0No vote 23 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 61Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 7Abst. 1No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland010
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

No vote recorded, 158

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 158 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.95 352 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 495 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment211 for, 440 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 514 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 10 to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment210 for, 454 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 524 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 452 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.94 510 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 56 to paragraph 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment211 for, 443 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.94 509 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 512 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment199 for, 372 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 469 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment208 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 12 — part 2 — Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024”. Vote, 12 March 2026. votingId 188910, reference 2025/2138(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188910 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-12-188910,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 12 — part 2 — Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188910}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/188910},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188910, reference 2025/2138(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}