Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after paragraph 14

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Vote
Amendment 1, after paragraph 14
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
67 for · 501 against · 62 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:58
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 14 – Am 1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0036
Dossier
2025/2214(INI)
Vote id
188590
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 67 for, 501 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 11 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 3Against 39Abst. 5No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
S&DFor 1Against 118Abst. 1No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 163Abst. 0No vote 21 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 31Abst. 32No vote 21 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 4Against 1Abst. 20No vote 3 of 28Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 2No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France800
Greece100
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 630 members

No vote recorded, 88

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 88 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment95 for, 495 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 580 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 12 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAmendment72 for, 461 against, 91 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 560 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 4 Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in VenezuelaAmendment83 for, 465 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)Rejection95 for, 546 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.84 581 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital T White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment78 for, 515 against, 87 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 591 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 50 to paragraph 50 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment92 for, 536 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 591 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 42 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment71 for, 507 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 599 voters
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)Rejection102 for, 543 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 15 %r · shared0.81 580 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating repression of the Baha’is in IranAmendment79 for, 493 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 522 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 23 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment84 for, 535 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 584 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188590
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1, after paragraph 14 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188590, reference 2025/2214(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188590 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188590,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after paragraph 14 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188590}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188590},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188590, reference 2025/2214(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}