Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
102 for · 543 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:12
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 2 on the decision
Official label
A10-0273/2025 – Sven Mikser, Pierfrancesco Maran, Aura Salla – Proposal for rejection – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0273
Dossier
2025/0176(COD)
Vote id
196519
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 102 for, 543 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 1Abst. 3No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 14Against 34Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
S&DFor 1Against 121Abst. 2No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 1Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 174Abst. 0No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 2Against 72Abst. 1No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 6Against 63Abst. 7No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 22Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany200
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland012
France700
Greece201
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 662 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)Rejection95 for, 546 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.91 654 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment95 for, 495 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 602 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment98 for, 528 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 605 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment67 for, 501 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 580 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 46 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment88 for, 543 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 602 voters
25 Nov 2025Proposal to vote on amendments European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)Procedural87 for, 542 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.80 590 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 328 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sectionsAmendment73 for, 556 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 592 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 9 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment106 for, 518 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 605 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 7 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment91 for, 515 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 565 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating repression of the Baha’is in IranAmendment79 for, 493 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196519
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196519, reference 2025/0176(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196519 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196519,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196519}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196519},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196519, reference 2025/0176(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}