Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to vote on amendments

Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law

Vote
Proposal to vote on amendments
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
164 for · 447 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:11
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 19 on the decision
Official label
A10-0126/2025 – Emil Radev – Proposal to vote on amendments
Text
Report A-10-2025-0126
Dossier
2022/0408(COD)
Vote id
186899
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 164 for, 447 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 161Abst. 1No vote 24 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 71Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 6No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 618 members

No vote recorded, 100

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 100 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 560 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 120 to paragraph 38 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment181 for, 456 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.96 555 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 566 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 257 to recital 15 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment180 for, 392 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 489 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 262 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.96 555 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 101 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 562 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 261 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 459 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.95 559 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 264 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment181 for, 461 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.95 557 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 489 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186899
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to vote on amendments — Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 186899, reference 2022/0408(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186899 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-186899,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to vote on amendments — Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186899}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186899},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186899, reference 2022/0408(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}