Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 15 — part 4, after paragraph 16

Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 15 — part 4, after paragraph 16
Result
350 for · 187 against · 56 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
24 February 2026, 11:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 43 of 62 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR, The Left · split vote: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 16 – Am 15/4
Vote id
185874
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 350 for, 187 against, 56 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘regrets the fact that the Temporary Protection Directive is interpreted so narrowly that many women who have fled Russia’s war of aggression cannot access abortion care or other sexual and reproductive health treatments, including treatment following sexual abuse; reiterates its call, in its resolution of 29 February 2024, on the Commission to review the directive in order to ensure that all Member States are obliged to offer the same care that women could otherwise receive in Ukraine;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 2No vote 17 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 26Against 36Abst. 4No vote 10 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
EPPFor 75Against 45Abst. 29No vote 37 of 186Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ECRFor 2Against 56Abst. 5No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 35Against 21Abst. 11No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 9Against 7Abst. 5No vote 10 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 593 members

No vote recorded, 125

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 125 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 49 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote358 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 440 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 459 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.73 476 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote454 for, 169 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, S&D, Membersr · shared0.72 554 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 23 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote452 for, 155 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.71 553 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.71 471 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote393 for, 194 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.70 538 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 8 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote434 for, 138 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.70 539 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital Z Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote431 for, 165 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.70 537 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.70 481 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 15 — part 4, after paragraph 16 — Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine”. Vote, 24 February 2026. votingId 185874, reference 2026/2599(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-24/185874 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-24/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-24-185874,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 15 — part 4, after paragraph 16 — Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-24/185874}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-24/185874},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 185874, reference 2026/2599(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}