Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 2

Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 2
Result
372 for · 134 against · 57 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
24 February 2026, 11:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 62 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR, Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 4/2
Vote id
185823
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 372 for, 134 against, 57 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘recognises Ukraine’s European integration as a strategic priority for the EU, and calls for the EU and its Member States to prepare for future enlargement by implementing internal reforms and developing a clear strategy for enlargement; underlines the importance of accelerating Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 9Abst. 18No vote 11 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 1No vote 15 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 139Against 2Abst. 4No vote 41 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 9Against 30Abst. 21No vote 19 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
PatriotsFor 0Against 54Abst. 9No vote 21 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 0Against 17Abst. 3No vote 11 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium020
Czechia061
Denmark010
Spain050
France0260
Hungary010
Italy006
Latvia010
Netherlands040
Poland020
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

No vote recorded, 155

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 155 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 30 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment428 for, 164 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 524 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 4 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote417 for, 192 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 518 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote426 for, 172 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.92 523 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote411 for, 202 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 504 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.91 526 voters
8 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Competition policy – annual report 2024Final358 for, 124 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.90 443 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 524 voters
8 May 2025Final vote Suspending certain parts of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 as regards imports of Ukrainian products into the European UnionFinal354 for, 147 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.89 443 voters
21 May 2026Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package)Final369 for, 126 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 459 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceFinal393 for, 169 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 514 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine”. Vote, 24 February 2026. votingId 185823, reference 2026/2599(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-24/185823 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-24/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-24-185823,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-24/185823}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-24/185823},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 185823, reference 2026/2599(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}