Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital O

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Separate vote: recital O
Result
257 for · 297 against · 25 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Recital O
Vote id
184758
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 257 for, 297 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 42Against 17Abst. 2No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
EPPFor 5Against 139Abst. 1No vote 42 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 2Against 59Abst. 2No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 53Abst. 16No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 15Against 8Abst. 1No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia210
Germany700
Spain010
France010
Greece220
Italy001
Luxembourg010
Romania020
Slovakia300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 579 members

No vote recorded, 140

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 140 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 533 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 577 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 69 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote291 for, 356 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 533 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 42 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote290 for, 357 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.89 534 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 493 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.89 544 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.89 576 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.89 574 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 577 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital O — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184758, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184758 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184758,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital O — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184758}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184758},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184758, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}