Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 2

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
246 for · 318 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 8/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0256
Dossier
2025/2133(INI)
Vote id
184748
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 33Against 23Abst. 6No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
EPPFor 8Against 136Abst. 0No vote 43 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 2Against 59Abst. 2No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 13Against 7Abst. 4No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 576 members

No vote recorded, 143

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 143 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote245 for, 332 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 575 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 525 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 530 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 55 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote289 for, 347 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 528 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 574 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 571 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 574 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 15 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment263 for, 356 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 502 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.91 543 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184748
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184748, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184748 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184748,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184748}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184748},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184748, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}