Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to vote on amendments

Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Vote
Proposal to vote on amendments
Result
206 for · 430 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 February 2026, 13:02
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 30 on the decision
Official label
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Proposal to vote on amendments
Vote id
184684
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 206 for, 430 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 2Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 3Against 44Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 4Against 104Abst. 11No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
RenewFor 2Against 67Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 8Against 168Abst. 0No vote 11 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 33Against 39Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
PatriotsFor 70Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 24Against 5Abst. 0No vote 3 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany810
Spain100
France010
Greece400
Italy100
Luxembourg100
Romania110
Slovakia510

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.89 502 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.88 529 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 11 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment168 for, 434 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 614 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment110 for, 375 against, 82 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 513 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment209 for, 413 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 592 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaAmendment142 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 495 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on GeorgiaAmendment159 for, 396 against, 90 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 586 voters
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – AustraliaOther134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.78 460 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment154 for, 513 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 602 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to vote on amendments — Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products”. Vote, 10 February 2026. votingId 184684, reference 2025/0322(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184684 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-10-184684,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to vote on amendments — Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184684}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184684},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184684, reference 2025/0322(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}