Skip to content

Text · Plenary report

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)

Report A-10-2026-0013 · COM(2025)0353 – C100140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD)

Kind
Plenary report A-10-2026-0013
Date
4 February 2026
Committee
Committee on Legal Affairs
Rapporteur
Magdalena Adamowicz
More facts (4)
Voted
  • 10 Feb 2026 Passed 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstained
Subject matter
MARI, PROP
Reference
COM(2025)0353 – C100140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

Parliament adopts its first-reading position on the codified regulation on European Union designs, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the legal services.

Position. The Committee on Legal Affairs proposes that Parliament adopt its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the legal services.

Key points

  1. The proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts without any change in their substance.
  2. Parliament adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party.

Legal basis. Article 294(2) and Article 118, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Draft european parliament legislative resolution

(COM(2025)0353 – C100140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure – codification)

The European Parliament,

–having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2025)0353),

–having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 118, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C100140/2025),

–having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

–having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts,

–having regard to Rules 112 and 60 of its Rules of Procedure,

–having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A10-0013/2026),

A.whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance;

1.Adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

2.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Back matter, 2

Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.

Annex: opinion of the consultative working party of the legal services of the european parliament, the council and the commission 13 blocks
Table from the text: block 1
CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES

Brussels, 4 September 2025

OPINION

FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

THE COUNCIL

THE COMMISSION

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)

COM(2025)353 final of 3.7.2025 – 2025/0190(COD)

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 11 July 2025 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.

At that meeting, an examination of the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council codifying Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on European Union designs resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that in recitals 38 and 39 of the draft codified text the word ‘would’, contained in recitals 27 and 28 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, should be reinstated in the place of the word ‘should’.

In addition, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.

F. DREXLER E. FINNEGAN D. CALLEJA CRESPO

Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director-General

Annex: declaration of input 1 block

The rapporteur declares under her exclusive responsibility that she did not include in her report input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Procedure – committee responsible 1 block
Table from the text: Title
TitleEuropean Union designs (codification)
ReferencesCOM(2025)0353 – C10-0140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD)
Date submitted to Parliament3.7.2025
Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenaryJURI 8.9.2025
Rapporteurs Date appointedMagdalena Adamowicz 4.7.2025
Date adopted28.1.2026
Result of final vote+: –: 0:19 1 0
Date tabled4.2.2026
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 blocks

19 · For

ECR
Mario Mantovani
EPP
Maravillas Abadía Jover, Alexander Bernhuber, Henrik Dahl, Axel Voss, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Marion Walsmann, Michał Wawrykiewicz
Patriots
Ton Diepeveen, Pascale Piera
Renew
Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Dainius Žalimas
S&D
Victor Negrescu, René Repasi, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Tiemo Wölken, Lara Wolters
The Left
Mario Furore
Greens
Tineke Strik

1 · Against

ESN
Mary Khan

0 · Abstained

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

Its dossier

Decisions on this text

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)”. Text, 10 February 2026. docId A-10-2026-0013, reference A10-0013/2026, procId 2025-0190. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0013 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0013_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/A-10-2026-0013 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-a-10-2026-0013,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0013}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/A-10-2026-0013},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId A-10-2026-0013, reference A10-0013/2026, procId 2025-0190. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0013\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}