Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Feb 2026
Result
278 for · 121 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 February 2026, 17:10
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine
Vote id
184681
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 278 for, 121 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 62 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 41Against 1Abst. 0No vote 33 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 6Against 99Abst. 4No vote 78 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 35Against 0Abst. 1No vote 43 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 45Against 6Abst. 0No vote 33 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 0Against 10Abst. 2No vote 15 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 3Against 5Abst. 9No vote 15 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia010
Germany071
Hungary010
Poland001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 415 members

No vote recorded, 303

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 303 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 361 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 362 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 39 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote475 for, 181 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.79 383 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 54 Public procurementSeparate vote440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 382 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 21 — part 1 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment393 for, 182 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.78 365 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment256 for, 249 against, 135 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.78 378 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 1 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment410 for, 146 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.77 358 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote415 for, 215 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 376 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment334 for, 231 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 348 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 278 to recital 24 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment326 for, 232 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.73 341 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-09/184681
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine”. Vote, 9 February 2026. votingId 184681. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-09/184681 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-09-184681,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-09/184681}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-09/184681},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184681. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}