Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to paragraph 2

Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness

Vote
Amendment 1 to paragraph 2
Result
343 for · 277 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:06
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 6 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0268/2025 – Olivier Chastel – § 2 – Am 1
Vote id
183886
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 343 for, 277 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 113Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 9Against 55Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 164Against 3Abst. 2No vote 18 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 9No vote 8 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 8Against 17Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium200
Czechia800
Denmark100
Spain600
France2900
Greece100
Hungary009
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 634 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 571 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.93 572 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 574 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 576 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 237 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.92 576 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.92 576 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.92 576 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 6 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicinesAmendment298 for, 264 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&D, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.92 509 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 270 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 573 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 — Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 183886, reference 2025/2034(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183886 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-183886,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 — Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183886}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183886},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183886, reference 2025/2034(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}