Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 22 Jan 2026
Result
318 for · 247 against · 67 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:08
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 6 of 6 on the decision
Official label
A10-0268/2025 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2025-0268
Dossier
2025/2034(INI)
Vote id
183057
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 318 for, 247 against, 67 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 45Against 3Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 7Against 105Abst. 2No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 171Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 4Against 6Abst. 56No vote 13 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 14Against 56Abst. 8No vote 8 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 13Abst. 1No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Germany0110
Denmark200
Estonia020
Spain0160
Finland002
France0100
Greece030
Croatia040
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0180
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia100
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania070
Sweden400
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 45 to Article 2 — part 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment253 for, 379 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 571 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Final316 for, 281 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.71 561 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment248 for, 378 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.70 565 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 1 — part 2 Urgent need to revise the Medical Devices RegulationSplit vote420 for, 208 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 560 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 5 — part 2 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote323 for, 184 against, 95 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 538 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 13 — part 3 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote304 for, 229 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.69 521 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsFinal343 for, 160 against, 150 abstained Adopted For 53 %r · shared0.69 581 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote327 for, 235 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.68 601 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment225 for, 325 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.68 515 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 69 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote305 for, 309 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.67 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183057
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 183057, reference 2025/2034(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183057 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-183057,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183057}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183057},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183057, reference 2025/2034(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}