Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to recital A

Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies

Vote
Amendment 1 to recital A
Result
288 for · 294 against · 63 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 13:06
More facts (6)
Position
vote 37 of 53 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0261/2025 – Jana Toom – Recital A – Am 1
Vote id
183530
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 30Abst. 8No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 58Abst. 7No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 168Against 1Abst. 0No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 39Against 10Abst. 30No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ESNFor 3Against 14Abst. 7No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
No groupFor 8Against 6Abst. 11No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Italy2200
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland1800
Romania400
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.88 587 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 586 voters
15 Dec 2025Monday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group (epizootic) Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)Other240 for, 194 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.87 398 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 594 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 594 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 266 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.87 581 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.87 588 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 586 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.87 589 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.87 584 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 to recital A — Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183530, reference 2025/2131(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183530 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183530,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to recital A — Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183530}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183530},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183530, reference 2025/2131(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}