Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital F — part 2

Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States

Vote
Recital F — part 2
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
428 for · 204 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 13:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, Patriots · split vote: ESN, Patriots
Official label
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital F/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0252
Dossier
2025/2028(INI)
Vote id
183478
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 21Against 7Abst. 10No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 62Against 5Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 163Against 9Abst. 3No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 3Against 67Abst. 0No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium020
Czechia080
Denmark010
Spain060
France0280
Greece010
Hungary090
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.92 582 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.92 593 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Stock-taking of the European elections 2024Final388 for, 186 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.91 555 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 599 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Split vote407 for, 190 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 571 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Banking Union – annual report 2025Final376 for, 187 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.91 529 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Split vote434 for, 217 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 627 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.91 569 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.91 584 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSplit vote380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 509 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183478
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital F — part 2 — Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183478, reference 2025/2028(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183478 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183478,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital F — part 2 — Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183478}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183478},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183478, reference 2025/2028(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}