Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 3 — part 3

Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States

Vote
Paragraph 3 — part 3
Result
379 for · 216 against · 53 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 13:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ESN, Patriots
Official label
A10-0252/2025 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 3/3
Vote id
183466
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 379 for, 216 against, 53 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “considers that the limited transposition of these non-binding provisions reveals a lack of political will to overcome national resistance and commit to a democratic process that better reflects the European dimension;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 6Abst. 25No vote 8 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 3No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 103Against 0Abst. 19No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
RenewFor 61Against 7Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 157Against 13Abst. 1No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 2Against 69Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 18Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Germany520
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain010
Finland300
France1100
Ireland600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands340
Poland100
Portugal100
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Stock-taking of the European elections 2024Final388 for, 186 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.88 551 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote425 for, 199 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.87 602 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 36 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote431 for, 213 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.87 598 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 583 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 23 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote383 for, 184 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 522 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSplit vote380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 502 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Split vote407 for, 190 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 567 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital G — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 593 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 67 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineSplit vote428 for, 173 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 583 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 4 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote430 for, 201 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.87 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 3 — part 3 — Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183466, reference 2025/2028(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183466 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183466,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 3 — part 3 — Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183466}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183466},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183466, reference 2025/2028(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}