Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 2

Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises

Vote: Paragraph 10 — part 2
Decision: No. 9 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result: 325 for · 290 against · 31 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 20 January 2026, 13:10

More facts (6)

Position: vote 2 of 4 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left, S&D · split vote: Members
Official label: A10-0257/2025 – Leire Pajín – § 10/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0257
Dossier: 2025/2085(INI)
Vote id: 183400

Position: vote 2 of 4 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left, S&D · split vote: Members
Official label: A10-0257/2025 – Leire Pajín – § 10/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0257
Dossier: 2025/2085(INI)
Vote id: 183400

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 38	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 51	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 122	Against 1	Abst. 1	No vote 12 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.98
Renew	For 52	Against 12	Abst. 2	No vote 9 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.68
EPP	For 43	Against 105	Abst. 20	No vote 20 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.44
ECR	For 0	Against 68	Abst. 2	No vote 9 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Patriots	For 0	Against 79	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 1	Against 20	Abst. 3	No vote 3 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.75
No group	For 18	Against 5	Abst. 3	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	1–4–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–1–0	1–0–1	3–0–0	0–0–2	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	1–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–2–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–2	0–3–0	0–8–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	4–0–0	15–0–0	11–0–1	0–7–0	2–25–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–0	7–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	1–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	1–0–0	4–0–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	0–20–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–1–0	2–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	4–0–0	11–0–0	12–0–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–0–7	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	3–1–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	1–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–10–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	9–0–0	4–0–0	20–0–0	no member voted	0–2–7	0–22–0	0–7–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–1	1–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	3–0–0	3–4–0	3–3–0	0–1–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	16–5–1	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–0–3	no member voted
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	1–0–0	5–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	11–0–0	3–0–0	0–8–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	4–0–2

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	Against	Abst.
Belgium	0	2
Bulgaria	1	0
Cyprus	1	0
Czechia	3	0
Denmark	1	0
Estonia	1	0
Spain	2	0
Finland	1	0
France	4	0
Greece	2	0
Italy	22	0
Lithuania	2	0
Latvia	2	0
Netherlands	1	0
Poland	18	0
Romania	4	0
Sweden	3	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Adrian-George AXINIA group that day: ECR · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Antonio DECARO group that day: S&D · Italy
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Assita KANKO group that day: ECR · Belgium
Benoit CASSART group that day: Renew · Belgium
Carlo FIDANZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Catherine GRISET group that day: Patriots · France
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Dóra DÁVID group that day: EPP · Hungary
Eszter LAKOS group that day: EPP · Hungary
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gerolf ANNEMANS group that day: Patriots · Belgium
Gheorghe PIPEREA group that day: ECR · Romania
Grzegorz BRAUN group that day: No group · Poland
Irene MONTERO group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI group that day: EPP · Poland
Javi LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Javier ZARZALEJOS group that day: EPP · Spain
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO group that day: Renew · Portugal
Katarina BARLEY group that day: S&D · Germany
Kathleen FUNCHION group that day: The Left · Ireland
Kinga KOLLÁR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Loránt VINCZE group that day: EPP · Romania
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Luke Ming FLANAGAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA group that day: ECR · Poland
Manfred WEBER group that day: EPP · Germany
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG group that day: No group · Germany
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Niels FUGLSANG group that day: S&D · Denmark
Niels GEUKING group that day: EPP · Germany
Nora MEBAREK group that day: S&D · France
Paolo INSELVINI group that day: ECR · Italy
Pär HOLMGREN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL group that day: EPP · Portugal
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Peter AGIUS group that day: EPP · Malta
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Petr BYSTRON group that day: ESN · Germany
Reinis POZŅAKS group that day: ECR · Latvia
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Siegfried MUREŞAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Sofie ERIKSSON group that day: S&D · Sweden
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA group that day: ECR · Croatia
Stine BOSSE group that day: Renew · Denmark
Sven MIKSER group that day: S&D · Estonia
Sven SIMON group that day: EPP · Germany
Tobias CREMER group that day: S&D · Germany
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ group that day: S&D · Lithuania
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE group that day: Renew · Belgium
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Jun 2025	Paragraph 67 — part 2 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Split vote	321 for, 272 against, 64 abstained Adopted	For 49 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.88 591 voters
17 Jun 2025	Paragraph 66 — part 2 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Split vote	327 for, 250 against, 81 abstained Adopted	For 50 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.86 592 voters
12 Feb 2026	Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Amendment	284 for, 281 against, 17 abstained Adopted	For 49 %	Requested by Members	r · shared0.85 542 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Mar 2025	Paragraph 31 — part 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025	Split vote	339 for, 325 against, 17 abstained Adopted	For 50 %		r · shared0.84 607 voters
12 Mar 2025	Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025	Split vote	317 for, 343 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 47 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.84 596 voters
13 Nov 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025	Final	310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted	For 52 %		r · shared0.84 551 voters
11 Mar 2026	Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026	Split vote	282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.83 582 voters
12 Mar 2025	Paragraph 19 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025	Split vote	317 for, 352 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 47 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.83 606 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 4 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Split vote	274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 47 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.83 542 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality	Amendment	274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained Rejected	For 42 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.83 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Resolution · report by Leire Pajín 20 Jan 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183400, reference 2025/2085(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183400,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183400, reference 2025/2085(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}