Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 159

Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest

Vote
Amendment 159
Result
517 for · 127 against · 15 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0272/2025 – Tomislav Sokol – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 159
Vote id
183248
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 517 for, 127 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 2No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 64Against 1Abst. 3No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 165Against 15Abst. 0No vote 8 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 62Against 9Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 2Against 20Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 14Against 2Abst. 10No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium300
Bulgaria400
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany3000
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland130
France060
Greece700
Croatia600
Hungary700
Ireland400
Italy900
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands600
Poland2110
Portugal600
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 659 members

No vote recorded, 60

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 60 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Recital I — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 614 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote464 for, 99 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 523 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 71 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote439 for, 100 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 526 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 612 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 612 voters
8 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Final561 for, 109 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.83 624 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.83 610 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 5 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote447 for, 74 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 501 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.82 600 voters
3 Apr 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus - threats from the Investigative CommitteeSplit vote477 for, 113 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 159 — Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183248, reference 2025/0102(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183248 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183248,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 159 — Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183248}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183248},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183248, reference 2025/0102(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}