Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
420 for · 207 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 13:09
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 53 of 53 on the decision
Official label
A10-0261/2025 – Jana Toom – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2025-0261
Dossier
2025/2131(INL)
Vote id
183122
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 46Against 18Abst. 4No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.51
EPPFor 140Against 18Abst. 11No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
ECRFor 3Against 65Abst. 2No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia100
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Greece020
Italy0230
Lithuania010
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0180
Romania202
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.90 433 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Final404 for, 208 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.90 583 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyFinal385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.89 538 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentFinal360 for, 210 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 551 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.88 574 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 1 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment418 for, 180 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 562 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 22 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote377 for, 166 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 537 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AF Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote285 for, 198 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 470 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 605 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 1 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment430 for, 188 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183122
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183122, reference 2025/2131(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183122 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183122,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183122}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183122},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183122, reference 2025/2131(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}