Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16, after paragraph 49

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Vote
Amendment 16, after paragraph 49
Result
170 for · 386 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 49 – Am 16
Vote id
182983
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 170 for, 386 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 41Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 0Against 102Abst. 0No vote 34 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 59Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 4Against 137Abst. 8No vote 39 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 48Against 6Abst. 15No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.54
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria040
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany0280
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland020
France105
Greece040
Croatia060
Ireland030
Italy070
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands042
Poland0210
Portugal060
Romania010
Sweden050
Slovenia320
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 584 members

No vote recorded, 135

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 135 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment185 for, 426 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 518 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)Other130 for, 316 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.94 386 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 50 to paragraph 117 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 445 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 539 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment161 for, 428 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 500 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 515 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 130, adding text after paragraph 18 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment193 for, 451 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 543 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.94 531 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 516 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment164 for, 418 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 495 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment187 for, 440 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16, after paragraph 49 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182983, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182983 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182983,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16, after paragraph 49 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182983}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182983},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182983, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}