Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 260

Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 260
Result
506 for · 71 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 33 of 41 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 260
Vote id
182090
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 83 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 30Abst. 2No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 5No vote 21 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 2No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 155Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 58Against 2Abst. 4No vote 15 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 59Against 6Abst. 11No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 2Against 16Abst. 3No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 8Against 17Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0102
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland200
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 606 members

No vote recorded, 113

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 113 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 1 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.90 494 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineSplit vote460 for, 72 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 559 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineFinal446 for, 63 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renew, EPPr · shared0.87 484 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandFinal412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 456 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote538 for, 75 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.86 591 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote532 for, 85 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.86 596 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 515 voters
23 Jan 2025Separate vote on paragraph 4 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Separate vote521 for, 66 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 87 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 515 voters
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureFinal469 for, 97 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 520 voters
24 Oct 2024Final vote — text as a whole People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around TaiwanFinal432 for, 60 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 478 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 260 — Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182090, reference 2024/2108(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182090 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182090,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 260 — Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182090}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182090},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182090, reference 2024/2108(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}