Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 251 — part 3

Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

Vote
Paragraph 251 — part 3
Result
472 for · 64 against · 70 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 41 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left, Patriots
Official label
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 251/3
Vote id
182072
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 472 for, 64 against, 70 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls for a commensurate policy response that gives priority to addressing the gaps in European defence and deterrence capabilities, especially in cooperation with like-minded European partners;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 26Abst. 9No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 3No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 113Against 0Abst. 3No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 61Against 0Abst. 2No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 151Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 61Against 2Abst. 4No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 31Against 6Abst. 38No vote 10 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 0Against 15Abst. 6No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
No groupFor 6Against 15Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia001
Germany0102
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland002
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 606 members

No vote recorded, 113

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 113 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineFinal446 for, 63 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renew, EPPr · shared0.89 486 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandFinal412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 459 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineSplit vote460 for, 72 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 559 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureFinal469 for, 97 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 523 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 5 — part 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineSplit vote418 for, 105 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.84 564 voters
11 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole EU strategic defence and security partnershipsFinal440 for, 119 against, 85 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.84 550 voters
13 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaFinal400 for, 63 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.84 456 voters
28 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudFinal444 for, 72 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 514 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote492 for, 70 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 497 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 515 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 251 — part 3 — Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182072, reference 2024/2108(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182072 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182072,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 251 — part 3 — Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182072}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182072},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182072, reference 2024/2108(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}