Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after paragraph 125

Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

Vote
Amendment 2, after paragraph 125
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 27 Nov 2025
Result
174 for · 415 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 41 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 125 – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0226
Dossier
2024/2108(INI)
Vote id
182054
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 174 for, 415 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 7No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 115Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 147Abst. 4No vote 35 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 65Against 2Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 17Against 3Abst. 1No vote 6 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 14Against 6Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium010
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France040
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.97 371 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.96 376 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.96 388 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment186 for, 470 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 564 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment188 for, 460 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 562 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 558 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther119 for, 337 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.96 388 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 108, adding text after paragraph 8 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment187 for, 449 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 557 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 522 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 24 to recital N The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment182 for, 455 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 556 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182054
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 2, after paragraph 125 — Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182054, reference 2024/2108(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182054 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182054,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after paragraph 125 — Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182054}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182054},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182054, reference 2024/2108(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}