Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29, after recital 12

Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders

Vote
Amendment 29, after recital 12
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result
201 for · 451 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:27
More facts (3)
Position
vote 76 of 91 on the decision
Official label
C10-0263/2025 – After recital 12 – Am 29
Vote id
181919
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 201 for, 451 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 9Against 59Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
EPPFor 4Against 170Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 80Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 7No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Czechia100
Germany1200
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 659 members

No vote recorded, 60

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 60 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 355 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment187 for, 457 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.96 606 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 261 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 459 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.96 607 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 357 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 454 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 601 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 356 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 604 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 351 to recital 9 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment186 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 595 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 365 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 607 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 394, adding text after recital 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment182 for, 446 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Patriots, EPPr · shared0.95 597 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 352 to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment181 for, 453 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 598 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 372 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 458 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181919
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 29, after recital 12 — Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181919. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181919 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181919,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29, after recital 12 — Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181919}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181919},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181919. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}