Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result
134 for · 526 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:12
More facts (3)
Position
vote 1 of 91 on the decision
Official label
C10-0263/2025 – Proposal for rejection – Am 1= 37=
Vote id
181885
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 134 for, 526 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 20 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 7Against 118Abst. 1No vote 10 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 31Against 36Abst. 1No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
EPPFor 1Against 176Abst. 0No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 72Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 81Abst. 0No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 5Against 22Abst. 1No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Proposal to reject the text Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersRejection138 for, 512 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.94 623 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.82 522 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 521 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 522 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 608 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 607 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment96 for, 549 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 608 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 609 voters
13 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.78 605 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 14 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment92 for, 427 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 485 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181885
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to reject the text — Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181885. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181885 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181885,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181885}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181885},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181885. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}