Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2

EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic

Vote: Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2
Decision: No. 8 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result: 481 for · 113 against · 67 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 26 November 2025, 12:33

More facts (6)

Position: vote 11 of 25 on the decision
Requested by: split vote: Patriots
Official label: A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0229
Dossier: 2025/2116(INI)
Vote id: 181864

Position: vote 11 of 25 on the decision
Requested by: split vote: Patriots
Official label: A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0229
Dossier: 2025/2116(INI)
Vote id: 181864

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘with that in mind, considering that Norway’s EU membership would strengthen both its national interests and the EU’s geopolitical resilience by closing critical gaps in the latter’s collective defence – notably in the GIUK gap’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 6	Against 18	Abst. 15	No vote 7 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.19
Greens	For 50	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 127	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 65	Against 1	Abst. 1	No vote 8 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.96
EPP	For 169	Against 0	Abst. 6	No vote 13 of 188	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.95
ECR	For 41	Against 4	Abst. 29	No vote 5 of 79	Majority line For	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.33
Patriots	For 17	Against 58	Abst. 6	No vote 4 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.57
ESN	For 0	Against 18	Abst. 3	No vote 6 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.79
No group	For 6	Against 14	Abst. 7	No vote 3 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–0–6	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–9–0	0–1–0	0–2–0
Germany	1–2–1	13–0–0	14–0–0	8–0–0	29–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–12–0	1–7–1
Denmark	0–1–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	3–1–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	1–1–0	4–0–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	4–0–0	12–0–0	10–0–0	0–0–6	0–4–0	0–29–0	no member voted	0–0–1
Greece	0–0–4	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	0–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	1–2–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	10–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–1	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	1–0–8	4–0–0	20–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	0–0–22	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	22–0–0	19–0–0	0–1–0	0–0–2	0–1–0
Portugal	0–1–0	no member voted	7–0–0	1–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	1–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	10–0–0	3–0–0	10–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–0
Sweden	0–0–2	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–0–3	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–4

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	2	0	0
Belgium	2	0	0
Czechia	1	0	0
Germany	13	0	0
Denmark	3	0	0
Spain	4	0	0
Finland	2	0	0
France	4	0	0
Croatia	1	0	0
Italy	4	0	0
Lithuania	1	0	0
Luxembourg	1	0	0
Latvia	1	0	0
Netherlands	6	0	0
Romania	1	0	0
Sweden	3	0	0
Slovenia	1	0	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Antonio DECARO group that day: S&D · Italy
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Aurelijus VERYGA group that day: ECR · Lithuania
Axel VOSS group that day: EPP · Germany
Branislav ONDRUŠ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Catarina MARTINS group that day: The Left · Portugal
César LUENA group that day: S&D · Spain
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Dóra DÁVID group that day: EPP · Hungary
Eero HEINÄLUOMA group that day: S&D · Finland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS group that day: EPP · Greece
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Francisco ASSIS group that day: S&D · Portugal
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Grégory ALLIONE group that day: Renew · France
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jérémy DECERLE group that day: Renew · France
João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO group that day: Renew · Portugal
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Jutta PAULUS group that day: Greens · Germany
Katri KULMUNI group that day: Renew · Finland
Kostas PAPADAKIS group that day: No group · Greece
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Manuela RIPA group that day: EPP · Germany
Michal WIEZIK group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Niels FUGLSANG group that day: S&D · Denmark
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA group that day: EPP · Spain
Rada LAYKOVA group that day: ESN · Bulgaria
René AUST group that day: ESN · Germany
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sander SMIT group that day: EPP · Netherlands
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Sandro GOZI group that day: Renew · France
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Sergey LAGODINSKY group that day: Greens · Germany
Silvia SARDONE group that day: Patriots · Italy
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Tomasz BUCZEK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Tomasz FROELICH group that day: ESN · Germany
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
13 Feb 2025	Paragraph 4 — part 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia	Split vote	390 for, 98 against, 67 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.87 509 voters
9 Oct 2024	Paragraph 9 — part 2 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration	Split vote	500 for, 119 against, 41 abstained Adopted	For 76 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.85 599 voters
18 Jun 2025	Paragraph 15 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on Moldova	Split vote	469 for, 97 against, 83 abstained Adopted	For 72 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.84 599 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
13 Feb 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 3 Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia	Separate vote	390 for, 109 against, 52 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.83 506 voters
15 Sept 2026	Recital BT — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Split vote	459 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.83 608 voters
22 Oct 2025	Paragraph 9 — part 2 Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections	Split vote	450 for, 153 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 73 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.83 577 voters
15 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 47 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Separate vote	458 for, 156 against, 47 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by ESN, Patriots	r · shared0.82 607 voters
17 Jul 2024	Paragraph 3 — part 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine	Split vote	476 for, 107 against, 42 abstained Adopted	For 76 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.82 567 voters
24 Feb 2026	Paragraph 4 — part 1 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine	Split vote	422 for, 81 against, 58 abstained Adopted	For 75 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.81 524 voters
18 Jun 2025	Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on Moldova	Final	456 for, 118 against, 51 abstained Adopted	For 73 %		r · shared0.81 578 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic Resolution · report by Urmas Paet 26 Nov 2025 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point a — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point c — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point e Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point o Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ad — part 3 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ag — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181864
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2 — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181864, reference 2025/2116(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181864 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181864,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2 — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181864}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181864},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181864, reference 2025/2116(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}